Site Overview

Site overview

Format

My plan is to start with the basic premises and terminologies, then go on to show many lines of evidence that simply do not line up with the "theory" of evolution, from the immutable Laws of Physics, to examining things like the fossil record, to molecular and genetic evidence, and biochemistry. Taken together, the evidence against evolution is quite staggering.

From there I intend to show evidence that the universe could not possibly have created itself, but that some sort of outside agent or intelligence must have been behind it. I will then go on to show compelling evidence for who/what this outside intelligence can be, and cannot be.

Each subject will have its own page and are listed in a progressive order, beginning with "The Ultimate Question" below. The bottom of each page will have a link bringing you to the next page in the progression.

(You can also click the "View Page" button under each description below, or go to the "Page Menu" dropdown and jump to any page you'd like. Reference footnotes for each page are found at the bottom of that page.)

The Ultimate Question

How did life in the universe originate? Darwinism has become the pervading view of the scientific community. But is this belief justified by the facts? On this page I will cover basic thoughts and terminologies to set the stage for succeeding pages.

Physics and Evolution

Here we cover the first of the fatal flaws encountered by the theory of evolution: the laws of thermodynamics. These laws define the fundamental physical properties of the universe and are immutable. Thermodynamics present an impassable barrier to evolution theory.

The Origin of 1st Life

The origin of life is probably the most ignored issue of evolutionary apologists. We will see that the gap between the living and non-living world is so immense that it simply cannot be bridged by any hypothetical naturalistic scenario. This explains why evolutionists generally ignore the subject.

The Fossil Record

Often trumpeted as proof of evolution, we will show that the fossil record is exactly the opposite !! We will show that the transitional fossil demanded by Darwinism are simply not there, and expose the gaps which are the actual hallmark of the fossil record. We will see that the handful of alleged intermediates that have been found are not intermediates at all. And finally, we will look at the fossil record as it relates to the origin of man, demonstrating that the supposed line of succession from ape to man is nothing of the kind.

Punctuated Equilibria

Darwin was absolutely insistent that evolution by natural selection must be a very slow, gradual process. He postulated that there then must be innumerable intermediate transitional fossil forms linking one group to another in the evolutionary chain. However, in Darwin's time, none of these transitional fossils had been found. Darwin appealed to an "extreme imperfection" of the fossil record as to why the transitional fossils had not been found and was confident that with further search they would be found. Well, 150 years later the situation had not changed. This fatal flaw in Darwin's theory has lead some current scientists to propose a different mechanism to explain away these gaps. This page discusses the main theory that tries to explain away this fatal flaw.

Other Supposed Evidence for Evolution

Here we outline some of the other supposed evidences that evolutionists have traditionally used to bolster their theory, particularly homology, embryology and vestigial organs. As we will see, none of these topics can be used as evidence for evolution.

The Molecular Evidence

Here we highlight the relatively new science of molecular biology as it relates to evolution. The study of the pre-Darwinian model of biology called typology, which is strictly defined as “classification according to general type,” is discussed, especially in the light of molecular biological findings. The typological view of nature was held by the majority of biologists until it was replaced by evolution. This chapter will show that the new findings of molecular biology surprisingly support this typological view of nature and testify against evolution.

Genetic Evidence

This page discusses mutations and genetics as they relate to Darwinism. Can mutations account for the change that evolution describes? Also covered is a situation rarely discussed by evolutionists called “Haldane’s Dilemma.” It involves the calculations performed by geneticist J.B.S. Haldane which clearly demonstrates that higher vertebrate species (like us) could not possibly have evolved in the available time.

Biochemistry and Design

The field of biochemistry, begun when Watson and Crick discovered the double-helical shape of DNA, has unlocked the secrets of the cell. With that biochemists have unexpectedly discovered a microscopic world of incredible complexity. Modern science has learned that, ultimately, life is a molecular phenomenon. All organisms are made of molecules that act as the nuts and bolts, gears and pulleys of biological systems. It becomes obvious—based on the structure of these complex molecular systems—that a Darwinian explanation for the origin of these systems are simply not possible.

The natural and obvious deduction of the science of Intelligent Design is also covered on this page. The science of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause rather than an undirected process such as natural selection. Intelligent design is thus scientifically in disagreement with the core claim of evolutionary theory, clearly stating that even the simplest form of life is far too complex to ever have been formed by random processes.

Probability Science

The science of probability is one of the most trustworthy disciplines in science. We've already gone through several lines of evidence that contradict the evolutionary theory, Here we will ignore all those flaws, suspend disbelief, and look at the actual probability. of spontaneous generation of life and evolution occurring.. The scientific laws of probability will be shown to clearly rule out even the most remote possibility that life could have originated and evolved by random natural processes.

In Their Own Words

This page contains dozens of quotes by prominent evolutionists. These quotes are NOT taken out of context.. Of course these quotes are not admissions by the authors that creation is correct and evolution is wrong. They merely highlight the fact that the theory of evolution is so flawed that even its proponents can’t gloss over the problems and see no choice but to address them..

Interpretation and Bias

Creationists and evolutionists look at the same information. The differences are the preconceived notions brought into the investigations and the subsequent interpretation of the data. An example is given of a prominent evolutionist’s article on why evolution is correct, and a critique of this article without evolutionary preconceptions.

Ultimate Origins

Scientific evidence strongly supports the idea that the universe had a beginning.. To the horror of evolutionists and atheists, this opens the to the concept of creation. Here we look at current theories of the beginning of the universe, and show that a Creator/God better explains what might have happened. Once established we go on to discuss the attributes such a Creator must have, as well as cannot have. It will become clear that the God of the Bible fits all logical characteristics.

Reliability of the Bible

If the Bible is truly the Word of God one would expect it to be flawless. Here we start by demonstrating that the Bible itself that we possess is a reliable document that has been transmitted to us in essentially the same form in which it was originally written. No other book of antiquity can even come close to the reliability of the Bible.

Archaeology and the Bible

Here we will illuminate much of the evidence which verifies the historicity of the accounts of the Old and New Testaments. The abundance of evidence, with zero proven errors, lends further credibility to the divine nature of the Bible.

Prophecy and the Bible

The final and best evidence for the Divine inspiration of the Bible is fulfilled prophecy. If you want to find the fingerprint of an almighty God in the Bible, or any other book, the best way is to look to fulfilled prophecy. There are literally hundred of fulfilled prophecies in the Bible. In no other religious or secular literature do we find the accuracy of fulfilled prophecy as well as the lack of any false prophecies. There can be no other explanation than that the Bible is in fact the Word of God !!